Comment in:

<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16627491&itool=pubmed_AbstractPlus">BMJ. 2006 Apr 22;332(7547):925-6.</a>

<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16675829&itool=pubmed_AbstractPlus">BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1095.</a>

<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16675828&itool=pubmed_AbstractPlus">BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1095.</a>

[edit] Accuracy and self correction of information received from an internet breast cancer list: content analysis.

• Esquivel A,
• Meric-Bernstam F,
• Bernstam EV.

School of Health Information Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of false or misleading statements in messages posted by internet cancer support groups and whether these statements were identified as false or misleading and corrected by other participants in subsequent postings.

DESIGN: Analysis of content of postings.

SETTING: Internet cancer support group Breast Cancer Mailing List. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES: Number of false or misleading statements posted from 1 January to 23 April 2005 and whether these were identified and corrected by participants in subsequent postings.

RESULTS: 10 of 4600 postings (0.22%) were found to be false or misleading. Of these, seven were identified as false or misleading by other participants and corrected within an average of four hours and 33 minutes (maximum, nine hours and nine minutes).

CONCLUSIONS: Most posted information on breast cancer was accurate. Most false or misleading statements were rapidly corrected by participants in subsequent postings.

PMID: 16513686 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]